From: Greg Lindahl Subject: Re: wsize & PAGE_SIZE issues on IA64 clients. Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:09:57 -0800 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030331190957.GA1206@greglaptop.internal.keyresearch.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 66-122-194-201.ded.pacbell.net ([66.122.194.201] helo=localhost.localdomain) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1904fs-0007G4-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:10:28 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2VJ9vMb001218 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:09:57 -0800 Received: (from lindahl@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2VJ9vbo001216 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:09:57 -0800 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > The fix/workaround was to either increase wsize to 16K, or reduce > PAGE_SIZE to 4K, obviously increasing wsize to 16K makes more sense. > > However this leads to a problem between Linux clients and servers where > the maximum supported block size on the server is 8K and the page size on > the IA64 client is 16K. Is the "wsize < PAGE_SIZE" problem worth a printf in mount or mountd or the kernel? -- greg ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs