From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: performance question Date: 01 Apr 2003 07:40:27 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20030331213739.25218.qmail@pour.midcoast.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 190EVh-0007tE-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 21:40:37 -0800 To: jp@pour.midcoast.com In-Reply-To: <20030331213739.25218.qmail@pour.midcoast.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == jp writes: > Server (coffeepot) - Athlon XP2000, Suse 8.1, 2.4.21-pre6 > kernel from kernel.org, boots to an ata100 drive, promise > rm8000 external hardware raid5 array on adaptec Adaptec > AHA-2940U/UW/D controller, 3com 3c905C forced to 100-FD with > "/sbin/mii-tool -F 100baseTx-FD eth1". Why do you have to force it to 100-FD? Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs