From: Philippe =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gramoull=E9?= Subject: Problems with statd and lockd Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:56:38 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030405015638.5118fbb9.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from pgramoul.net2.nerim.net ([80.65.227.234] helo=philou.aspic.com) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 191b3J-0000f3-00 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 15:56:57 -0800 Received: from philou.gramoulle.local (philou.gramoulle.local [192.168.254.2]) by philou.aspic.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 91CA8278E for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:56:38 +0200 (CEST) To: NFS Mailing List Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, Recently we started to get the following error messages on an Linux NFS server, running 2.4.21-pre5 vanilla, Debian unstable > statd: server localhost not responding, timed out > nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=-5 > lockd: cannot monitor A restart of nfs-kernel-server cleared the problem. We have filesystems that are exported sync, other are exported async. Can you tell me what the "-5" return code means ? I've looked at the source code (nsm_mon_unmon in mon.c that sends back to nfs3proc.c and the rpc_call wrapper but i'm lost after that :) Can someone enlighten me ? Thanks, Philippe ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs