From: Philippe =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gramoull=E9?= Subject: Re: Problems with statd and lockd Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:05:32 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030405140532.2ce1873e.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> References: <20030405015638.5118fbb9.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <20030405131821.595ca734.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from pgramoul.net2.nerim.net ([80.65.227.234] helo=philou.aspic.com) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 191mQh-000348-00 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 04:05:51 -0800 Received: from philou.gramoulle.local (philou.gramoulle.local [192.168.254.2]) by philou.aspic.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 59A1F1717 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:05:32 +0200 (CEST) To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On 05 Apr 2003 13:50:29 +0200 Trond Myklebust wrote: | The message just means what it says. The problem could be anything | from a temporary hang of statd or the portmapper right down to a deep | kernel bug. | Trond Ok, Portmapper was up. It was statd that was down and lockd , but they had been started correctly before the problem happened. I'll try to reproduce the problem as it happened of 4 different NFS servers. I'll turn RPC debugging on and see if i can get something interesting. Thanks, Philippe ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs