From: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>
Subject: RE: Soft vs Hard mounts
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:26:01 -0700
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61131274E2@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: <nfs@sourceforge.net>
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: "Greg Lindahl" <lindahl@keyresearch.com>
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>

> 4.  educate sysadmins how to make soft mounts more reliable
>     by thoroughly testing to determine a reasonable set of
>     mount options.

let me clarify here:  one of *us* should do the testing, and
we should post the results in the FAQ or how-to.


-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com

_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs