From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: mysterious NFS-behaviour Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 10:56:01 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200305081056.01105.bernd-schubert@web.de> References: <03May8.101130cest.115214@gw.cae-gmbh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-path: Received: from smtp01.web.de ([217.72.192.180] helo=smtp.web.de) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19DhAc-0003Av-00 for ; Thu, 08 May 2003 01:54:30 -0700 Received: from [217.185.93.81] (helo=hdlb-d9b95d51.pool.mediaWays.net) by smtp.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.98 #218) id 19DhAS-0006pB-00 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 May 2003 10:54:21 +0200 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <03May8.101130cest.115214@gw.cae-gmbh.de> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thursday 08 May 2003 10:17, Christoph Dohmen wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was told about a very mysterious behaviour of a NFS-system. But I could > not explain what's happening. So, maybe someone of this list is able?! > > Well, there's a system running suse linux 7.2 with kernel 2.4.4 on a Have you ever been thought about upgrading your kernel ? > nfs-server using software-raid for the exported directory. More than 60 > clients (also suse 7.2 with 2.4.4) mount this export. Upgrade the clients as well. > So the behaviour is the following: > I have one client and open four terminales. > In the first terminal (local) I do a mkdir foo in the mounted directory > In the second terminal (local) I do a ls in the mounted directory and I get > an I/O-error > In the third terminal (ssh on the nfs-server) I can see the created > directory. In the fourth terminal (ssh on another client) I can see the > created directory after about one or two seconds. > > So, what's going on? Is there a misconfiguration? Are 60 clients too many?? > 2.4.4 is really old and many nfs- and other fs-fixes have been done since the release of this kernel version. Furthermore I think everything below 2.4.8 can be considered as very buggy and shouldn't be used in a production environment. Bernd ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs