From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Timeouts gone wild on ia64 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 13:19:45 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3EBBE331.5000207@RedHat.com> References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C6113127DB4@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200] helo=lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19EBWq-0008Oz-00 for ; Fri, 09 May 2003 10:19:28 -0700 To: "Lever, Charles" Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Lever, Charles wrote: >however, equivalent behavior would be: > > #define RPC_RTO_MIN (HZ/50) > >not HZ/30. why did you choose 30? > I realize this but... I figured waiting a a few extra ticks of time before timing out was probably a good thing with respect to soft mounts on slow servers... Especially since EIO errors can be pretty disruptive... ;-)\ SteveD. ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs