From: Bogdan Costescu Subject: Re: Spam in the NFS list Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:48:35 +0200 (CEST) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20030513064446.3a7ca4b4.jake@staunch.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mail.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.104.30]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19Fb5B-0007s9-00 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:48:45 -0700 To: Jake Gold In-Reply-To: <20030513064446.3a7ca4b4.jake@staunch.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jake Gold wrote: > Is there any reason for leaving the list open to email from > non-subscribed users? Yes: receiving bug reports. This is the same reason why linux-kernel, linux-smp and others cannot become closed. > Most of the technical lists that I'm on have adopted a subscriber-only > email policy with little resistance from their members... This would be fine if only developers are on it. They are interested in being on the list for as long as possible, while people posting just to report a bug/crash/problem would just want to get some advice on their specific bug/crash/problem and then go away. -- Bogdan Costescu IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu@IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs