From: Andreas Metzler Subject: Re: Spam in the NFS list Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <1052841825.13572.0.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> Return-path: Received: from mailbox.surfeu.at ([212.197.128.120] helo=surfeu.at) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19Fd0G-0002Ib-00 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 09:51:48 -0700 Received: from [81.5.252.69] (HELO downhill.univie.ac.at) by surfeu.at (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 50719792 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 May 2003 18:51:12 +0200 Received: from news by downhill.univie.ac.at with local (Exim 4.14) id 19Fcu6-00036Q-8p for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 May 2003 18:45:26 +0200 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 07:48, Bogdan Costescu wrote: >> Yes: receiving bug reports. This is the same reason why linux-kernel, >> linux-smp and others cannot become closed. > Have you ever looked at the number of bug reports on l-k from > non-subscribers that get listened to? It's approximately zero, and has > been for years. [...] I recently found a bug, sent some mails there[1] and got a patch[2] that fixed the problem for me. cu andreas [1] ff., [2] <1051280848.5939.61.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs