From: "Steven N. Hirsch" Subject: Re: Spam in the NFS list Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:39:55 -0400 (EDT) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mta5-0.mail.adelphia.net ([64.8.50.187] helo=mta5.adelphia.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19FiUI-0005jS-00 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 15:43:10 -0700 To: Bogdan Costescu In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, 13 May 2003, Bogdan Costescu wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jake Gold wrote: > > > Is there any reason for leaving the list open to email from > > non-subscribed users? > > Yes: receiving bug reports. This is the same reason why linux-kernel, > linux-smp and others cannot become closed. > > > Most of the technical lists that I'm on have adopted a subscriber-only > > email policy with little resistance from their members... > > This would be fine if only developers are on it. They are interested in > being on the list for as long as possible, while people posting just to > report a bug/crash/problem would just want to get some advice on their > specific bug/crash/problem and then go away. Spamassassin + Bayesian classifier is nailing 100% of this crap on my system. Didn't even realize it was occuring until seeing this thread and checking the (overflowing) spam bucket. Steve ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs