From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: more info please Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 00:37:58 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16066.50502.902796.455991@charged.uio.no> References: Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Trond Myklebust , "Duc Vianney" , Matt Schillinger , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19G4t3-0007R7-00 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 15:38:13 -0700 To: Bruce Allan In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Bruce Allan writes: > Hi Trond, > Have the newer statistics counters been put in since 2.5.66? > On 2.5.66 all I see are 'proc4 <#null> <#compound>'. > It's good to know more detail is being added; I really need to > grab the latest bits. Grab the latest bk snapshot. The NFS client on 2.5.x wasn't really very stable prior to Tuesday's snapshot. But yes: as you can see we are in the process of adding stuff to the nfs4_procedures[] array. Those 'RPC procedures' will again provide the more detailed statistics (and hopefully also faster+better NFSv4 performance). Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs