From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: KNFSD information needed Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 16:26:42 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200305021626.42933.bernd-schubert@web.de> References: <002301c310aa$0ef33350$6e00a8c0@compaq3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-path: Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19BbUy-0003xE-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2003 07:26:52 -0700 To: "David Shirley" , In-Reply-To: <002301c310aa$0ef33350$6e00a8c0@compaq3> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Friday 02 May 2003 14:55, David Shirley wrote: > Hi All, > > For a while now I was under the impression that nfsd provided with Redhat > was the be all and end all, today after we had some fcntl locking issues it > appears thats not the case. > > My first question is knfsd the same as the nfsd included in the nfs-utils > package? Hmm, knfsd consists of 2 parts, the kernel nfsd-module and nfs-utils rpc.nfsd. So the answer should be yes. [snip] > > Sorry for these basic questions but the total lack of information online > is quite shocking. http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ > > Cheers > Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs