From: Greg Lindahl Subject: Re: nfs over TCP stable? Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 16:29:41 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030503232941.GB4957@greglaptop.attbi.com> References: <3EB44527.6090005@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 12-234-18-241.client.attbi.com ([12.234.18.241] helo=localhost.localdomain) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19C6SX-0001bT-00 for ; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:30:25 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (greglaptop [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h43NTq37005091 for ; Sat, 3 May 2003 16:29:53 -0700 Received: (from lindahl@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h43NTfn3005089 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 3 May 2003 16:29:41 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <3EB44527.6090005@wanadoo.es> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 12:39:35AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Red Hat 9-kernel 2.4.20-9 doesn't include nfs over TCP because they > said that "it doesn't work good enough in our testing....." > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88583 Note that they are talking about CONFIG_NFSD_TCP, i.e. the daemon side of TCP support. Client support is much older, and Redhat has had it turned on for ages. greg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs