From: Xose Vazquez Perez Subject: Re: nfs over TCP stable? Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 21:43:47 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3EB6BEF3.5080609@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.es ([62.37.236.137] helo=smtp.wanadoo.es) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19ClsM-0004FF-00 for ; Mon, 05 May 2003 12:43:50 -0700 Received: from wanadoo.es ([80.103.136.196]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h45IpDYf004058 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:51:14 +0200 (MEST) To: nfs Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Greg Lindahl wrote: >Note that they are talking about CONFIG_NFSD_TCP, i.e. the daemon side >of TCP support. Client support is much older, and Redhat has had it >turned on for ages. Yes, I was talking about kernel nfs daemon server. regards, -- Galiza nin perdoa nin esquence. Governo demision! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs