From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: SM_UNMON again -> kernel Date: 11 Jul 2003 11:38:57 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20030711061615.GA1924@quasar.nro.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from panoramix.vasoftware.com ([198.186.202.147] helo=externalmx.vasoftware.com ident=mail) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19auhH-0000Eb-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 03:00:18 -0700 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:61815) by externalmx.vasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19auQk-0000W6-SA for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 02:43:07 -0700 To: Lawrence Ong In-Reply-To: <20030711061615.GA1924@quasar.nro.au.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Is /etc/hosts consistent? The kernel only sends MON/UNMON requests on the loopback port, so this suggests that something is translating 127.0.0.1<->"mymachine" instead of to "localhost". Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs