From: Philippe Troin Subject: Re: SM_UNMON again -> kernel Date: 12 Jul 2003 20:22:30 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <87smpbkt55.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> References: <20030711061615.GA1924@quasar.nro.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lawrence Ong , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from tantale.fifi.org ([216.27.190.146] ident=root) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19bXSm-0004Nb-00 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 20:23:48 -0700 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Trond Myklebust writes: > Is /etc/hosts consistent? The kernel only sends MON/UNMON requests on > the loopback port, so this suggests that something is translating > 127.0.0.1<->"mymachine" instead of to "localhost". I've also been seeing this forever... Which also means that locks are never recovered after a server reboot, which is midly annoying. What do you mean by "consistent" /etc/hosts? % getent hosts localhost 127.0.0.1 localhost % getent hosts 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 localhost % host localhost localhost has address 127.0.0.1 % host 127.0.0.1 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer localhost. Is that consistent enough? Phil. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs