From: Lawrence Ong Subject: Re: SM_UNMON again -> kernel Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:25:57 +1000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030713042557.GA12903@quasar.nro.au.com> References: <20030711061615.GA1924@quasar.nro.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mail.netregistry.net ([203.202.16.100] helo=roanoak.netregistry.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19bqb7-0002NF-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:49:41 -0700 Received: from proxy.netregistry.net ([203.202.16.2] helo=quasar.nro.au.com) by roanoak.netregistry.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19bqaU-0007Se-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:49:02 +1000 Received: from long by quasar.nro.au.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19bqZy-0004cy-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:48:30 +1000 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: Resent-Message-Id: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:38:57AM +02i0, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > Is /etc/hosts consistent? The kernel only sends MON/UNMON requests on > the loopback port, so this suggests that something is translating > 127.0.0.1<->"mymachine" instead of to "localhost". Consistent? Well, this is what i have in /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 10.1.1.180 mymachine With some knowledge looking at the monitor.c code, when i changed my /etc/hosts to: 127.0.0.1 localhost mymachine The erroneous error disappeared. Dont't think this should be happening AT ALL. The statd code section: /* Match! */ dprintf(L_DEBUG, "UNMONITORING %s for %s", mon_name, my_name); Is entered when i changed /etc/hosts to 127.0.0.1 localhost mymachine. Then again, it's logical since my_name in statd's code is set to 127.0.0.1 automatically due to CERT CA-99.05. Maybe it's got to be rewritten somewhat? Anyhow, it shows that the kernel is still continually sending out unmonitor packets to statd at regular intervals. What the? Why is this happening? Thanks for the help. Cheers, Lawrence > > Cheers, > Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs