From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: SM_UNMON again -> kernel Date: 21 Jul 2003 01:28:40 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20030711061615.GA1924@quasar.nro.au.com> <87smpbkt55.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> <87k7aml330.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> <87vfu0ej5k.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> <87n0fb42o5.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> <20030719162218.GB7166@async.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Philippe Troin , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19eNc1-00079f-00 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 16:29:05 -0700 To: Christian Reis In-Reply-To: <20030719162218.GB7166@async.com.br> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Christian Reis writes: > If there's one thing special, it's that this server also runs > an iptables firewall that does masquerading and supports > connection tracking. Could it be mangling the lock packets? Huh? "Special" sounds like it would only begin to describe such a setup... The client has to be able to contact the server for portmapper, lockd, nfs and statd. Exactly how are you doing this with masquerading enabled? In particular, how are you ensuring that the portmapper returns correct information? Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs