From: Hans-Peter Jansen Subject: Re: nfs errors clutter up logs after 2.4.20 -> 2.4.22-pre10 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:50:09 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200308271250.09723.hpj@urpla.net> References: <200308231404.34087.hpj@urpla.net> <200308262328.09975.hpj@urpla.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19rxsU-0000ZZ-00 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 03:50:14 -0700 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19rxsU-0006tF-3E for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 03:50:14 -0700 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <200308262328.09975.hpj@urpla.net> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Trond, unfortunately, it hasn't fixed the phenomenon completely, but now it takes much longer to trigger it. After rebuilding and restarting tonight at 00:52, the first occurence was at 09:57, the next ones at 10:00 and 10:05. Do you think, it's worth playing with bigger RPC_RTO_MIN values? Cheers, Pete On Tuesday 26 August 2003 23:28, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > Hi Trond, > > sorry 'bout the huge delay, but let me acknoledge: perfect cut. > > Many thanks. > > Since it's very late in 2.4.22 and crucial for all NFS users, I Sorry, haven't tracked lkml/bk changelog sufficiently. Let's hope to get this right in .23. > hope, it's fine to CC you, Marcelo: if you didn't noticed already, > I highly recommend including this fix before 2.4.22-final (at least > it hasn't found its way into your tree until now...). Be prepared > about many more of these requests, if you don't ;-). > > if (Tronds_fault || !Tronds_fault) /* silly test */ > Tronds_heroscore += 100; > > Pete > > On Saturday 23 August 2003 19:28, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > >>>>> " " == Hans-Peter Jansen writes: > > > Hi, after kernel update all my (diskless) systems clutter > > > up the syslog with: > > > > > > Aug 23 13:41:42 yogi kernel: nfs: server shrek not > > > responding, > > > > Does the following patch help? > > > > Cheers, > > Trond > > > > --- linux-2.4.22-up/net/sunrpc/timer.c.orig 2002-08-14 > > 17:52:52.000000000 -0700 +++ > > linux-2.4.22-up/net/sunrpc/timer.c 2003-08-23 10:26:36.000000000 > > -0700 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > > > > #define RPC_RTO_MAX (60*HZ) > > #define RPC_RTO_INIT (HZ/5) > > -#define RPC_RTO_MIN (2) > > +#define RPC_RTO_MIN (HZ/10) > > > > void > > rpc_init_rtt(struct rpc_rtt *rt, long timeo) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs