From: Mark Hemment Subject: Re: Reply-cache Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:11:01 +0100 (BST) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <16182.52917.693714.6285@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Return-path: Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10] helo=mtvmime03.VERITAS.COM) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19m9d0-0004LU-00 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 03:10:14 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain(markhe.wat.veritas.com[10.10.185.104]) (1273 bytes) by megami via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 03:10:08 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #15 built 2001-Aug-30) To: Neil Brown In-Reply-To: <16182.52917.693714.6285@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Neil Brown wrote: > > > 3) For non-idempotent operations, hold an "inprogress-entry" in the > > reply-cache? > > > Doest "RC_INPROG" work for you as an inprogress-entry? If so, it is > already implemented. Yes, "RC_INPROG" works as an inprogress-entry. > But read operations and getaddr are idempotent, not non-idempotent, so > either you or I are a bit confused. It is me that is confused.... Mark ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs