From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: nfs_statfs: statfs error = 116 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:22:32 +1000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16234.19528.624551.573433@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <3F698142.6070404@inf.ethz.ch> <3F69B7FB.1050505@RedHat.com> <1063913183.1553.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Steve Dickson , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1A092y-0003HU-00 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:22:52 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.24] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1A092x-0005MY-P3 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:22:51 -0700 Received: From notabene ([129.94.242.45] == bartok.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU) (for ) (for ) (for ) By note With Smtp ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:22:38 +1000 To: Marc Schmitt In-Reply-To: message from Marc Schmitt on September 18 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On September 18, mschmitt@inf.ethz.ch wrote: > > A user has found a bug that appears when checking out a big subversion > repository on the same server over NFS, it will always timeout upon this > huge amount of file manipulations and the checkout fails. He then > reproduced the issue with a small script that basicly loops over those > four commands: > > rename ("old/bla", "new/bla") > stat("new,bla",..) > chmod("new/bla") > rename ("new/bla", "old/bla") > > Before 1000 iterations the script returns: Error setting new/bla to > read-only! We'll try to narrow this down on the test cluster, too. One > particularity has been found already: the bug only appears if > the renaming takes place over directory boundries. Sounds like you are using the "subtree_check" export flag on that export (possibly implicitly). You don't want to. i.e. add "no_subtree_check" after reading "man exports" NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs