From: Raphael Clifford Subject: Re: solaris server and firewalls Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:43:35 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3F706A27.3050302@clifford.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1A1pKq-0004Wa-00 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:44:16 -0700 Received: from ptb-mailc04.plus.net ([212.159.14.210]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.22) id 1A1pKp-0005Wd-CI for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:44:15 -0700 To: Ion Badulescu In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Ion Badulescu wrote: >On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Raphael Clifford wrote: > > > >>Ion Badulescu wrote: >> >> >> >>>However, as far as I know there is no mount program for Linux that >>>supports WebNFS. Amd tried to implement it at some point, but the idea >>>quickly died off for lack of interest and users. Maybe I'll have another >>>try at it some day, but if you're not using amd anyway then there is no >>>point in wasting my time... >>> >>> >>> >>I will happily use anything on the client side that will work. Thanks >>very much for having a look at this. I think a solution would be really >>useful. Especially as the internet is such an unpleasant place at the >>moment it seems a shame to have to open your firewall more than is >>strictly necessary :) >> >> > >All right, I've implemented support for webnfs mounting in the latest beta >(b4) of am-utils 6.1. [This could also go into the FAQ, I guess.] > >However, if you're not currently using an automounter, switching to amd >could be somewhat of a tall order... It would be nice if webnfs support >was implemented in mount(8), as it's simple enough, but I won't be the one >to do it. > >Ion > > > Ion, That is fantastic news. Just out of interest, who should I bug about mount? I couldn't seem to find a suitable maintainer listed anywhere. Cheers, Raphael ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs