From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Brasseur_Val=E9ry?= Subject: RE: readdir and readdirplus... Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:24:38 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <8147E1B07201DD41B6B9F0D31E07B384016486B1@srv-grp-s07.dev.atos.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1A2CRz-0007LP-00 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:25:11 -0700 Received: from srv-grp-s02.axime.com ([160.92.18.104]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1A2CRy-0000Tq-Hj for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:25:10 -0700 To: "Trond Myklebust" Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: here is one of my nfsstat : Client nfs v3: null getattr setattr lookup access readlink =20 0 0% 771483726 1% 6109 0% 827366925 0% 1040368089 0% 4862868 = 0%=20 read write create mkdir symlink mknod =20 -1853693236 1% 1340911105 0% 132162422 0% 260671 0% 8216 0% 0 = 0%=20 remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus 174498032 0% 1639 0% 210405486 1% 44505153 0% 5748 0% 155051 = 0%=20 fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit =20 34851 0% 3 0% 0 0% 0 0%=20 and the patch apply cleanly ! any way to verify ? > -----Original Message----- > From: Trond Myklebust [mailto:trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no] > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:01 PM > To: Brasseur Val=E9ry > Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [NFS] readdir and readdirplus... >=20 >=20 > >>>>> " " =3D=3D Brasseur Val=E9ry = writes: >=20 > > I am using a linux 2.4.20+NFS-ALL patches. my server is a > > Netapp Filer >=20 > > I am using NFSv3 >=20 > > what I did not understand is that it's seems that linux does > > not use READDIRPLUS ... is it normal ? in sources I have seen > > that certain condition should be met... but I never see any > > READDIRPLUS request !!! >=20 > My machine currently shows the following statistics against a filer: >=20 > Client nfs v3: > null getattr setattr lookup access readlink > 0 0% 6405 36% 777 4% 1719 9% 3534 20% 119 0% > read write create mkdir symlink mknod > 2340 13% 1645 9% 155 0% 4 0% 2 0% 0 0% > remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus > 165 0% 3 0% 13 0% 37 0% 21 0% 631 3% > fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit > 50 0% 5 0% 0 0% 0 0% >=20 > So READDIRPLUS should normally be quite usable. Are you sure that=20 > the patches applied cleanly? >=20 > Cheers, > Trond >=20 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs