From: Chip Salzenberg Subject: Re: New version of nfs-utils please! Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:02:07 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030912170207.GA28213@perlsupport.com> References: <20030911153150.GA29368@perlsupport.com> <16225.27552.308538.665130@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19xrJd-00072M-00 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:02:37 -0700 Received: from tandu.perlsupport.com ([66.220.6.226] ident=mail) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.22) id 19xrJd-0006u6-Gn for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:02:37 -0700 To: Neil Brown In-Reply-To: <16225.27552.308538.665130@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: According to Neil Brown: > I've just fixed the reported 'statd segfaults' problem. Cool beans. Really a glibc bug from the description, isn't it? > If you would like to make any appropriate changes to ChangeLog and > debian/* to reflect the new version number ... Done! Thanks. -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - "I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence, but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs