From: "H. J. Lu" Subject: Re: Hiya Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:55:42 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20031020185542.GA8226@lucon.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1ABlkA-0002ZP-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:55:30 -0700 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1ABfTq-0000hC-9m for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:14:14 -0700 To: "Brown, Rodney" In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I forwarded your email to the Linux NFS mailing list. H.J. ---- On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:33:13PM -0400, Brown, Rodney wrote: > We have been having some serious NFS client side issues with RedHat Advanced > Server 2.1 kernel e12 and e24. The backend NFS server is Solaris 8 (fully > patched). > > I noticed you posted a bug tracker reg some locking issues with NFS a while > back and had a patched connectathon testsuite. I was hoping you could toss me > a URL to get that so i can compile on our Linux nodes and run a similar test > to see if we can pinpoint the issues. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs