From: Chip Salzenberg Subject: Re: CVS tag "nfs-utils-1-0-6" looks wrong Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:33:02 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20031029163302.GF29526@perlsupport.com> References: <20031029162516.GE29526@perlsupport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AEtFc-0003rF-00 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:32:52 -0800 Received: from topaz.cx ([66.220.6.227] helo=mail.topaz.cx ident=mail) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1AEtFb-0006SR-WF for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:32:52 -0800 To: Neil Brown In-Reply-To: <20031029162516.GE29526@perlsupport.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: According to Chip Salzenberg: > Neil, do you know what went wrong with the CVS tags for 1.0.6? BTW, the 1.0.6 tarball also omits debian/po/* adn includes the empty and obsolete directory etc/debian. -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - "I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence, but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs