From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: CVS tag "nfs-utils-1-0-6" looks wrong Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:40:57 +1100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16288.20489.480630.795236@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <20031029162516.GE29526@perlsupport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AEzvz-0004bu-00 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:41:03 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.24] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEzvz-0000oB-8O for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:41:03 -0800 Received: From notabene ([129.94.211.194] == dulcimer.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU) (for ) (for ) By note With Smtp ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:40:57 +1100 To: Chip Salzenberg In-Reply-To: message from Chip Salzenberg on Wednesday October 29 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wednesday October 29, chip@pobox.com wrote: > Neil, do you know what went wrong with the CVS tags for 1.0.6? I > fixed the one on debian/changelog and then noticed that they seem > wrong all over the module. I must have done "cvs tag" from the wrong directory :-) I have now done it from the right place and all the tags look OK. Thanks. NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs