From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:55:07 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16307.50555.813132.978552@charged.uio.no> References: <3FB27670.4C878A84@psu.edu> <3FB29D43.A618973D@psu.edu> <16306.41898.291062.36209@charged.uio.no> <3FB2A738.3F2C90B8@psu.edu> <16306.49310.195265.145519@charged.uio.no> <3FB2DC60.FA7D3E08@psu.edu> <16306.59249.857512.354675@charged.uio.no> <3FB3A99F.126920E7@amis.com> Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKLgY-0001UR-00 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:55:14 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AKLgY-0001R9-Dd for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:55:14 -0800 To: Eric Whiting In-Reply-To: <3FB3A99F.126920E7@amis.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > This is not the same test, nor the same results as Jason's, but > here is some more data from bonnie and dd tests.This shows some > write performance difference between 2.4 and 2.6 eric How about vs. 2.4.23? Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs