From: Jason Holmes Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:55:52 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3FB3FDE8.47E819FF@psu.edu> References: <3FB27670.4C878A84@psu.edu> <3FB29D43.A618973D@psu.edu> <16306.41898.291062.36209@charged.uio.no> <3FB2A738.3F2C90B8@psu.edu> <16306.49310.195265.145519@charged.uio.no> <3FB2DC60.FA7D3E08@psu.edu> <16306.59249.857512.354675@charged.uio.no> <3FB3924B.7450E9F7@psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKPRR-0002GQ-00 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:55:53 -0800 Received: from vpn-19-5.aset.psu.edu ([146.186.19.5] helo=funkmachine.cac.psu.edu) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AKPRR-0003Af-3O for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:55:53 -0800 To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Jason Holmes wrote: > > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > Any hints on how I can reproduce your results? > > Unfortunately Gaussian's licensing would prohibit me from passing it > along to reproduce this. I'll try to reproduce this with another > program this morning and get back to you. OK, I haven't found any other program that behaves similar to Gaussian on this, but I did do a few more runs with 2.6.0-test9-bk17 vs 2.4.22, one set with nfs_debug on and one set with rpc_debug on. I haven't analyzed the files in depth (and doing so would really be beyond me at this point), but on a "dumb" level, the nfs files are of similar length in terms of lines, but the RPC file for 2.6.0-test9-bk17 is much larger: [root@fs4 log]# wc -l kern.* 16236 kern.nfs-2.4.22 17188 kern.nfs-2.6.0-test9-bk17 20565 kern.rpc-2.4.22 32684 kern.rpc-2.6.0-test9-bk17 Note that there is probably some small amount of noise in these files, but 98% of it should be from the Gaussian runs. I put them up at: http://magicbus.cac.psu.edu/nfs if you want to look at them. One small observation is that 2.4.22 reaches much larger values of cwnd than test9-bk17, resulting in a lot fewer calls to functions such as xprt_cwnd_limited (1861 vs. 2715). Whether or not this means anything, I don't know. Trond, if none of this helps and you really want to debug this, I can probably give you access to two machines to do so. Thanks, -- Jason Holmes ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs