From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Different NFSSVC_MAXBLKSIZE for udp and tcp clients? Date: 25 Nov 2003 20:40:53 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <3FC3929C.EFFE5CDF@moving-picture.com> <3FC3FD0C.B2DD2183@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: James Pearson , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AOog7-0002Ig-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:41:15 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AOog7-0007Ia-2Y for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:41:15 -0800 To: Greg Banks In-Reply-To: <3FC3FD0C.B2DD2183@melbourne.sgi.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Greg Banks writes: > What I would like is to allow UDP clients to use up to 48K and > TCP clients to use up to 4M. Those are already on the roadmap, but haven't yet made it to the top of the priority list... They will never make it into 2.4.x though. The main reason is the xdr_kmap() stuff, which doesn't really scale too well. Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs