From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Subject: Re: Different NFSSVC_MAXBLKSIZE for udp and tcp clients?
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:00:33 -0500
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <16324.2369.168928.378055@charged.uio.no>
References: <3FC3929C.EFFE5CDF@moving-picture.com>
	<3FC3FD0C.B2DD2183@melbourne.sgi.com>
	<shsvfp7zz2y.fsf@charged.uio.no>
	<3FC4071A.9214A0D3@melbourne.sgi.com>
Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: James Pearson <james-p@moving-picture.com>,
    nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net)
	by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AOoyx-0003d9-00
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:00:43 -0800
Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411)
	by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AOoyw-0000wr-RC
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:00:43 -0800
To: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FC4071A.9214A0D3@melbourne.sgi.com>
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>

>>>>> " " == Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com> writes:

    >> Those are already on the roadmap, but haven't yet made it to
    >> the top of the priority list...

     > Are there preliminary patches or analysis/random thoughts
     > somewhere online?

Most of the work should already have been done now that we've
eliminated MAX_IOVEC from the RPC code (those tests in nfs_xdr.h are
bogus and should be removed).

The remaining job is to make the 'pagevec' fields in nfs_read_data and
nfs_write_data support arbitrary size arrays.

Cheers,
  Trond


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs