From: seth vidal Subject: Re: NFS server not responding Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:01:50 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1070222510.14818.10.camel@binkley> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Douglas Furlong , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQXp8-0006NZ-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:05:42 -0800 Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu ([152.3.182.2] ident=[E0q4g80hNxjLSluhCWb73a3vUngm/JCf]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AQXp8-0001XQ-KX for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:05:42 -0800 To: Bogdan Costescu In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > The load on the server when simultaneously rebooting several tens of nodes > goes up to 10-12, while previously it was 3-5. IMHO, this points more to a > slower/less-efficient NFS daemon or to a more agressive client (but which > gives up easier afterwards as seen from the logged messages). it's the red hat kernel. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 I bet it's related to that problem. -sv ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs