From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Date: 12 Nov 2003 15:20:31 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <3FB27670.4C878A84@psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AK1Tl-0000yr-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:20:41 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AK1Tk-0003oM-Sq for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:20:41 -0800 To: Jason Holmes In-Reply-To: <3FB27670.4C878A84@psu.edu> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Jason Holmes writes: > Can someone clue me in as to why this may be happening and if > it's a "bug" or not? Large numbers of 'commit' operations are a typical sign of the memory management going wild. Have you compared this to the standard 2.6.0-test9 kernel? What sort of load did you otherwise have on that machine? Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs