From: Eric Whiting Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:08:59 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3FB2AF7B.B7FDC8AC@amis.com> References: <3FB27670.4C878A84@psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AK39d-0002rZ-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:08:01 -0800 Received: from dermis.amis.com ([207.141.5.253]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AK39d-0002wi-7B for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:08:01 -0800 To: Jason Holmes Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Jason Holmes wrote: > > I'm > already seeing some odd performance differences between the 2.4.22 > client and the 2.6.0-test9-mm1 client (both against a 2.6.0-test9-mm2 > server): Similar observations here. Our users have reported NFS slowdowns of 10x on 2.6.0-test6-mm4 nfs clients compared to the same box and setup running 2.4.22. Something is goofy in 2.6.0-test6-mm4 that has a bad effect on NFS client performance. eric ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs