From: Jason Holmes Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:16:43 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3FB3924B.7450E9F7@psu.edu> References: <3FB27670.4C878A84@psu.edu> <3FB29D43.A618973D@psu.edu> <16306.41898.291062.36209@charged.uio.no> <3FB2A738.3F2C90B8@psu.edu> <16306.49310.195265.145519@charged.uio.no> <3FB2DC60.FA7D3E08@psu.edu> <16306.59249.857512.354675@charged.uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKIH6-0006vh-00 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 06:16:44 -0800 Received: from vpn-19-5.aset.psu.edu ([146.186.19.5] helo=funkmachine.cac.psu.edu) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AKIH5-0001db-OF for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 06:16:43 -0800 To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Trond Myklebust wrote: > > >>>>> " " == Jason Holmes writes: > > > FWIW, I ran the test with nfsvers=2 (with the export still > > being async) and it finished in 112.53user 45.02system > > 2:43.50elapsed 96%CPU. > > For comparison, on my own machine, I get stats of the form: > > Client rpc stats: > calls retrans authrefrsh > 248291 6225 0 > Client nfs v2: > null getattr setattr root lookup readlink > 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > read wrcache write create remove rename > 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > link symlink mkdir rmdir readdir fsstat > 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > > Client nfs v3: > null getattr setattr lookup access readlink > 0 0% 77 0% 0 0% 60 0% 94 0% 0 0% > read write create mkdir symlink mknod > 0 0% 240378 96% 8 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus > 33 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 0% > fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit > 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 7628 3% > > Any hints on how I can reproduce your results? Unfortunately Gaussian's licensing would prohibit me from passing it along to reproduce this. I'll try to reproduce this with another program this morning and get back to you. Thanks, -- Jason Holmes ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs