From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: NFS server not responding Date: 04 Dec 2003 13:39:55 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <3FCF70D9.1010808@RedHat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ARyOS-0001TR-Qz for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:40:04 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ARyOS-0006hk-38 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:40:04 -0800 To: Steve Dickson In-Reply-To: <3FCF70D9.1010808@RedHat.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Steve Dickson writes: > linux-2.4.20-nfs-ia64-EIO.patch - increase RPC_RTO_MIN to > HZ/30 Err.. That's a decrease... You are setting the minimum timeout value at 1/30th of a second instead of 1/10th of a second. (FYI: HZ is the frequency of the timer interrupt. It tells you how many jiffies make up 1 second.) This might indeed explain why people are seeing an increase in resends and 'server not responding' messages. Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs