From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: RE: Chrooted BIND broke on NFS server between kernel 2.4.21 and 2.4.22 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:46:04 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200312141546.04970.bernd-schubert@web.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AVXVn-0003AK-25 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:46:23 -0800 Received: from smtp05.web.de ([217.72.192.209] helo=smtp.web.de) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1AVXVm-0000bo-M6 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:46:22 -0800 To: "Jeremy Kusnetz" , In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: > if (!(exp->ex_flags & NFSEXP_NOSUBTREECHECK)) { So giving 'no_subtree_check' as export option (man exports) should work as well, shouldn't it? Due to the problems already described on this list, I recently set this option to all rw-exported filesystems. Cheers, Bernd ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs