From: Juri Haberland Subject: Re: limitations at 5,8 GB? Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <200312251945.42382.nuway@gmx.net> Reply-To: Juri Haberland Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Abd5W-0005SM-Iz for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:56:26 -0800 Received: from cartman.spoiled.org ([80.190.101.194] helo=a.mx.spoiled.org) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Abd5W-0000LT-5A for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:56:26 -0800 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Stefan Ewert wrote: > I got a 100 GIG harddisk on my server and i mounted it on my client without > any warnings or problems. the only thing is that i now have 5.8 GB instead > of 100. Are there any restrictions in nfs protocol, or do u know a possible > solution for this prob? I don't know where your problem is but there is no restriction of that size in the NFS protocol. This what I get from 'df' on one of my clients: ... nfs:/export/data 160066688 150683400 9383288 95% /net/data ... You can see that I can access an exported disk with the size of 160GB. Cheers, Juri -- Juri Haberland ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs