From: seth vidal Subject: Re: NFSv4 daemons... Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:41:59 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1073619719.12271.7.camel@binkley> References: <1073608448.1380.22.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: hjl@users.sourceforge.net, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Aenb1-0007DZ-59 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:46:03 -0800 Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu ([152.3.182.2] ident=[cQ5m7SqUCMZo06hIpDI8yfPf+xTVKBqY]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Aenb0-0000cx-OZ for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:46:02 -0800 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <1073608448.1380.22.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 19:34, Trond Myklebust wrote: > We're at the point now with the NFSv4 project that we'd like to publish > the user daemons that are necessary to support the existing client in > the 2.6.0 kernel. > > Would it make sense to add these to the existing nfs-utils package? > > What type of stability have you seen from these? Do you think these might be in a place to benefit from some wider use? Thanks -sv ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs