From: Paul Jakma Subject: Re: NFSv4 daemons... Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:54:36 +0000 (GMT) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <1073608448.1380.22.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org> <1073619719.12271.7.camel@binkley> <1073621173.1398.55.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: seth vidal , hjl@users.sourceforge.net, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Ak2i3-0001Va-Di for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 06:54:59 -0800 Received: from hibernia.jakma.org ([213.79.33.168]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1Ak2i1-00051c-N6 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 06:54:58 -0800 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <1073621173.1398.55.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Trond Myklebust wrote: > rpc.gssd is necessary if you want to use strong authentication (for > NFSv2/v3 as well as for NFSv4). Does this implement data stream encryption? (rpcsec as opposed to rpc auth? (possibly getting my jargon wrong here)) > Cheers, > Trond regards, -- Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st Fortune: To thine own self be true. (If not that, at least make some money.) ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs