From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: Re :Re: NFSv4 and vi Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:23:32 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040223182331.GA5074@fieldses.org> References: <200402231401.12339.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.7] helo=sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AvMFz-00011l-KI for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:00:47 -0800 Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AvKrh-0005c6-1E for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:31:37 -0800 Received: from dsl093-002-214.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.2.214] helo=pumpkin.fieldses.org ident=Debian-exim) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.30) id 1AvKjw-00007A-K3 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:23:36 -0800 To: Vincent ROQUETA In-Reply-To: <200402231401.12339.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Vincent ROQUETA wrote: > Configuration: > server 2.6.2-CITI_NFS4_ALL-1 #2 SMP > client 2.6.2-CITI_NFS4_ALL-1 > > ptoblem: mount fail: > error (client side): > mount: type de sys. de fichiers erron?, option erron?e, super bloc erron? sur > 172.16.109.31:/, ou trop de syst?mes de fichiers mont?s > > (mout: bad filesystem type, bad options, bad super bloc on 172.16.109.31:/ or > too many filesytems mounted.) Which version of the nfs-utils is your mountd built from? This could be caused by not having the latest nfs-utils patches (in particular, http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/nfs-utils-patches/1.0.6-5/nfs-utils-04-upcall_export_check.dif is needed). For any further diagnosis a network trace would help (run tcpdump -wtmp.pcap -s0, and mail me tmp.pcap) > With this config: > client 2.6.2-all patches > server: linux 2.6.3-mm1 > > Problem with vi as reported in the first mail. > (So there is a problem on the server side?) It's possible. I've tested with 2.6.3-CITI_NFS4_ALL-2 (server and client) and I'm not able to reproduce the problem you report either with vi or with a c program that similarly tries open's on nonexistant files. --Bruce Fields ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs