From: =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Peter Lojkin=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= Subject: Re: off_t in nfsd_commit needs to be loff_t Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 06:20:13 +0300 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20040202120217.GA9380@cistron.nl> Reply-To: =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Peter Lojkin=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Neil Brown=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?=, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AowXS-0001WY-2B for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:20:18 -0800 Received: from f22.mail.ru ([194.67.57.55]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AowXQ-0002Cr-7E for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:20:16 -0800 To: =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Miquel van Smoorenburg=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= In-Reply-To: <20040202120217.GA9380@cistron.nl> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 at 13:02:18 +0100 Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > Turns out that the "offset" argument is off_t instead of loff_t. > It isn't used at all (unfortunately), but it _is_ checked for > sanity, so that's where the error came from. > > Here's the fix: nfsd_commit-loff_t.patch > > Should go into the next -rc, I guess. should this also be applied to 2.4? the code looks the same... ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs