From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Subject: Re: NSM lock recovery fails too often
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:47:42 -0500
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <1078847262.4067.7.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org>
References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435DD1F@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com>
	 <20040309142200.GC14419@suse.de>
	 <1078844671.4067.1.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org>
	 <20040309151054.GF14419@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Cc: Charles Lever <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20040309151054.GF14419@suse.de>
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net

P=E5 ty , 09/03/2004 klokka 10:10, skreiv Olaf Kirch:
> What I was referring to was the ability to have several RPC programs on a
> single svc_sock server side; e.g. NFS and NFSACL, or NLM and NSM. Pretty
> much the way svc_register from the good ole sunrpc code works.

Oh, sorry...

Hmm... Any reason why you couldn't put them all on port 2049 with this
patch? Would that be less efficient than having two sets of threads?

Cheers,
  Trond


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs