From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: Re: Root Over NFS Memory Problem Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:06:48 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200403041606.48365.bernd-schubert@web.de> References: <1078409937.3882.10.camel@nick0.seakr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AyuX3-0007AX-CV for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:13:05 -0800 Received: from smtp02.web.de ([217.72.192.151] helo=smtp.web.de) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1AyuR7-0002Bq-0u for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:06:57 -0800 Received: from [80.140.2.23] (helo=bathl.lan.fli4l) by smtp.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.99 #605) id 1AyuQz-0005lN-00 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:06:50 +0100 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <1078409937.3882.10.camel@nick0.seakr.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Thursday 04 March 2004 15:18, Nick Couchman wrote: > > We are running currently 43 system over a nfs root filesystem and > > none of those systems is suffering from such memory leak. So I > > really don't think this is a vanilla kernel issue. If you are sure > > > that its the kernel, try without OpenMosix and other patches. > > > Cheers, > > Bernd > > Two things: 1) What version of the kernel are you running? Currently 2.4.24 and 2.4.25, but we have had every kernel version since 2.4.18 except 2.4.22 since it had NFS-bugs (clients permanentely reported server not responding). > 2) We have > another Linux box running the same kernel, but it is not booting > root-over-NFS, it is using the local hard drive. This machine does not > "leak" memory. Is this machine also using OpenMosix? > Other ideas? Could it be portmap? Portmap is a userspace program, I think memory leakage in userspace is easy to detect using top, isn't it? Well, I don't thinkg that its important, we currently mount the nfs-root directory from an initrd and not directly from the kernel nfs-root-mount functions. However until 2.4.20 we also used the direct approach and had no problems. Sorry, no further ideas. Bernd ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs