From: Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: Marking inodes as stale can be wrong Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:28:37 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040429212837.GA23172@suse.de> References: <20040429144012.GA15361@suse.de> <1083257096.3686.27.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20040429165802.GA18748@suse.de> <1083258570.3686.38.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BJJ5E-0005Qz-Jm for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:28:40 -0700 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=Cantor.suse.de) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1BJJ5E-0002yE-6I for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:28:40 -0700 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <1083258570.3686.38.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 01:09:30PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > The correct workaround here is to advise people to *always* use > "no_subtree_check" and then to look into fixing these problems in future > revisions of the server, not the client. I agree with that. Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | The Hardware Gods hate me. okir@suse.de | ---------------+ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs