From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Linux' NFS locking b0rken? Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 15:03:49 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1085511829.9224.20.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <1085487829.6666.32.camel@tesla.mmt.bellhowell.com> <20040525123425.GO21886@suse.de> <1085503328.13681.4.camel@tesla.mmt.bellhowell.com> <1085507226.3872.132.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1085511385.11596.21.camel@tesuji.nac.uci.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Jeffrey Layton , Olaf Kirch , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BShDS-0001Lt-Ig for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 May 2004 12:03:58 -0700 Received: from dh132.citi.umich.edu ([141.211.133.132] helo=lade.trondhjem.org ident=Debian-exim) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.30) id 1BShDS-0007Al-6W for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 May 2004 12:03:58 -0700 To: Dan Stromberg In-Reply-To: <1085511385.11596.21.camel@tesuji.nac.uci.edu> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: P=E5 ty , 25/05/2004 klokka 14:56, skreiv Dan Stromberg: > Actually, wouldn't you be OK if you had a flock that was just a wrapper > around fcntl? No! flock locks behave very differently from POSIX locks after a fork(). Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs