From: Garrick Staples Subject: Re: 2.6.6 lockupy Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:26:16 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040526222616.GL6931@polop.usc.edu> References: <20040526211115.GI6931@polop.usc.edu> <20040526213732.GG2827@fieldses.org> <20040526214435.GK6931@polop.usc.edu> <20040526215555.GI2827@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="633Qqqc8nwy7lrt9" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BT6sT-0005Ml-Mt for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 26 May 2004 15:28:01 -0700 Received: from polop.usc.edu ([128.125.10.9]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1BT6sT-00057N-EV for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 26 May 2004 15:28:01 -0700 Received: from polop.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4QMQGmL017089 for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 15:26:16 -0700 Received: (from garrick@localhost) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4QMQG9M017087 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 26 May 2004 15:26:16 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20040526215555.GI2827@fieldses.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: --633Qqqc8nwy7lrt9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:55:56PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields alleged: > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 02:44:36PM -0700, Garrick Staples wrote: > > You didn't misunderstand... but I was at a complete loss with production > > machines suddenly dropping like flies. I'm now at the stage where I ju= st try > > random things =3DP >=20 > OK. May as well send us what information you have on the lockups, and > maybe your .config while you're at it.... It's more info then I feel like posting to the list, but I've got it at: http://www-rds.usc.edu/~garrick/nfsprobs/ =20 > (Also, you mention 2.6.6 in your subject line but it sounds like this > happens to you under earlier kernels as well? Are there any kernels > that are OK?) 2.6.6 locks up less often than 2.6.5. I also had 2.6.3, but it had other s= csi driver issues. 2.6.3 never saw this kind of load, but I can try it if you want. --=20 Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California --633Qqqc8nwy7lrt9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtRmI0SBUxJbm9HMRAj9dAKCQdASPGg6Xlp3lXNru5y75Oge/VgCfU2z8 8wJspod3ItrSYpWc0FLnEcI= =/TPC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --633Qqqc8nwy7lrt9-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs