From: Garrick Staples Subject: Re: nfsd, rmtab, failover, and stale filehandles Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:00:55 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040506230055.GC26968@polop.usc.edu> References: <20040506185603.GM23287@polop.usc.edu> <20040506191351.GP23287@polop.usc.edu> <20040506215311.GA26968@polop.usc.edu> <20040506222455.GP18964@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BLrsk-0007f2-2h for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 May 2004 16:02:22 -0700 Received: from polop.usc.edu ([128.125.10.9]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1BLrsj-0000yb-De for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 May 2004 16:02:21 -0700 Received: from polop.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i46N0tlv027071 for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 16:00:55 -0700 Received: (from garrick@localhost) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i46N0t8t027069 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 6 May 2004 16:00:55 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20040506222455.GP18964@fieldses.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 06:24:55PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields alleged: > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 02:53:11PM -0700, Garrick Staples wrote: > > I'm at a total loss. Everything I'm reading tells me that all I need t= o ensure > > is that fs device names are the same on both servers so that the genera= ted > > filehandles are the same, and that I need to move all lines matching > > ":$mountpoint:" in rmtab to the new server. The former is done since I= 'm using > > persistant device numbers with lvm. The latter shouldn't be needed bec= ause I'm > > using the "new" proc interface with 2.6.5. > >=20 > > rmtab definitly doesn't do any noticable difference. I can add random = text > > and blank it out with no noticable difference on the clients. > >=20 > > Is this a client problem? The clients are all 2.4.24 and 2.4.26. > >=20 > > All clients and servers are using vanilla kernels. > Hmm, also, could you try recompiling mountd with the following patch > applied? No effect. All I did was kill mountd, run the patched mountd, and try to '= ls' on the client. Watching an strace of mountd, it doesn't seem that mountd is ever contacted. The client reports stale filehandle pretty much immediately, and mountd doe= sn't do anything. --=20 Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAmsOn0SBUxJbm9HMRAtsQAJ9C4rdfkI9Tl6+8nhtOrysFonlTTQCfeP6W VtR71t7S2uqeZkYtLPXlkoY= =e3Vp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs