From: Garrick Staples Subject: Re: nfsd, rmtab, failover, and stale filehandles Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:37:13 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040513213713.GB1559@polop.usc.edu> References: <20040506185603.GM23287@polop.usc.edu> <20040506191351.GP23287@polop.usc.edu> <20040506215311.GA26968@polop.usc.edu> <20040506222455.GP18964@fieldses.org> <20040506230055.GC26968@polop.usc.edu> <20040507182543.GA27341@fieldses.org> <20040507213811.GL30964@polop.usc.edu> <20040507223414.GQ30964@polop.usc.edu> <20040513210045.GF20649@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BONvu-0001DB-Dx for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:40:02 -0700 Received: from polop.usc.edu ([128.125.10.9]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1BONvu-0002Ds-8w for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:40:02 -0700 Received: from polop.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4DLbDbw001959 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:37:13 -0700 Received: (from garrick@localhost) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4DLbDtl001957 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:37:13 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20040513210045.GF20649@fieldses.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:00:45PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields alleged: > On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Garrick Staples wrote: > > I'm looking at exportfs.c to see if I can add in a call to flush the ca= ching > > when unmounting, does the following seem reasonable? >=20 > Small note--I think your mailer must be messing up your patches--the > patch you appended e.g. has all tabs changed to spaces, and doesn't > apply. That's odd. I use mutt with vi. IRCC, I used'd vi's read function to read= the patch into the email. I can't imagine where any conversion would have taken place. Perhaps I copy/pasted from 'less', but I don't think so. --=20 Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAo+qJ0SBUxJbm9HMRAjw5AJ46SdZb1Q78MCwreiKiFvTxvJjrJgCgkPgj jfyyPn944umjuKo6Iv2ppnQ= =Z9Wc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs