From: Marc Schmitt Subject: Linux Client -> Solaris Server Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:38:23 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <40BDE65F.1000009@inf.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BVWpx-0008W7-Je for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 07:35:25 -0700 Received: from tri-e2k.ethz.ch ([129.132.112.23]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BVWpx-0007W4-6H for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 07:35:25 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hi all, I'm looking for hints on how to improve the performance of Linux clients (RHEL 3.0, 2.4.21-15.EL, 100Mb NIC) talking to a Solaris server (ES250, SunOS 5.9 Generic_112233-11 sun4u sparc, 100Mb NIC). What I currently get from my testing (dd if=/dev/zero of=zero.txt bs=2048 count=1000000) is between 2 and 2.5 MB/s. I upped the rsize/wsize to 32768 (according to http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/interop.html#SOLARIS) which did not help, the result was actually worse than not specifying any mount options at all. Running the dd test locally on the Sun returns a throughput of 14MB/s (SW RAID 5 on A1000). Iperf gives a decent 85Mb/s throughput between the server and a client, I think it's safe to say that the network layer is ok. I did the test using -o tcp,nfsvers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768, too, it made no difference at all. I hope to at least double the performance I currently measure. Does that mean I have to get rid of the Sun...? Any pointers are welcome, thanks. Greetings, Marc ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.